06/01/2025 Potential $20 billion Loss in Export Demand Threatens Rural CommunitiesThe Gene Technology Bill allows exempted and unregulated genetically engineered organisms (GE) into NZ with no assessment of risk. This Bill threatens the employment of 360,000 people who who rely on the agricultural sector and will be directly affected by a billion dollar downturn in demand. The Bill places costs and liability for GE contamination on the GE Free sector, destroying the livelihood of farmers and rural communities. Comments at the end of the year from the Coalition Government by Minister Judith Collins show that they have little awareness of the global demand for GE-free food in 2025 or the historical failed genetic engineering trials in New Zealand. New Zealand exports are under threat. The commercialisation of any NZ genetically engineered/ gene edited biotechnology has benefits for multiple international patent co-inventors, but at the cost of other sectors of the economy. The Trade Economy figure NZ organisation puts the 2024 New Zealand agricultural exports at $54 Billion projected to build to $57 billion in mid 2025. This income came from the demand for New Zealand’s high quality, GE Free products. The Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) 2024 Situation and Outlook report sole focus is on the excellent growth in demand for our GE Free agricultural produce. The New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIEI) report commissioned by Organic Aotearoa New Zealand (OANZ) projected a $10-20 billion dollar drop in export demand across the whole agricultural export sector.“This will not be offset by allowing commercialisation of unregulated and untraceable genetically engineered products that have no environmental or safety trials,” said Bleakley The Agri biotech corporates who are co-owners in NZ patents, will be given a free pass to dump their failed products onto New Zealand farmers. Exempting Gene Edited products from regulation and traceability will contaminate seed supply and New Zealand high quality produce will be substituted with pesticides and GE. The farming sector stakeholders were not consulted in the development of the Gene Technology Bill, nor were exporters or the public. What is the benefit? Why buy GE food produce from NZ, when the markets can get it at closer to home, with less food miles, travel costs and smaller carbon footprint? References: [1] Trade Economy figure NZ https://figure.nz/search/?query=trade+economy [2] Situation and Outlook.. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/66648-Situation-and-Outlook-for-Primary-Industries-SOPI-December-2024 [3] Patents owned by foreign countries https://figure.nz/chart/FfAHRZZdBrft7N3o [4] New Zealand patent applications to the EPO with foreign co-inventors https://figure.nz/chart/v1LueWKXD1kfmHJD[ [4] Potential costs of Regulatory changes https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U_E4gdKm8ijNhqMNqSjpCPwK2T6rGRp3/view [5] Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Gene Technology Bill https://www.mbie.govt.nz/science-and-technology/science-and-innovation/agencies-policies-and-budget-initiatives/gene-technology-regulation ENDS: Claire Bleakley president 027 348 6731 Jon Carapiet - spokesman 0210507681 |